https://gw1wiki.ezgame.cc/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=ArenaNet%3ASkill_feedback%2FWarrior%2F%22Shields_Up%21%22 2026-10-18T15:01:49Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.39.17 https://gw1wiki.ezgame.cc/index.php?title=ArenaNet:Skill_feedback/Warrior/%22Shields_Up!%22&diff=16402&oldid=prev 2009-09-07T08:24:34Z

<p>Replacing template calls. [bot]</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{ArenaNet namespace notice|skill feedback}}<br /> {{skill icon|&quot;Shields Up!&quot;}}<br /> <br /> == Life Infusion's Issue -- 14:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC) ==<br /> ; Issue<br /> :10 energy means Paragons can still use this better than Warriors <br /> :it only works against Rangers and Paragons and people that wand (+60 armor to all all non melee/elemental damage (since it is a short window) which would include wanding/spears/bows)<br /> : non-interruptible with duration<br /> <br /> ;Suggestion<br /> :reduce to 5 energy<br /> <br /> == Paragon/Warrior Issue ==<br /> ; Issue<br /> : This skill is much better on Paragons than Warriors. As such it can't be buffed to be good on Warriors since it'd be too OP on Paragons.<br /> ; Suggestion<br /> : Decrease cost, duration and recharge so that the fact that it can't be removed is not such a big deal (i.e. it's easier to wait out and if you kill/pressure the user you're more likely to prevent it's use or even divert it) but yet the overall cost and duration:recharge ratio stay roughly the same. Then re-work it slightly so that it's a bit more powerful for use on Warriors. E.g.:<br /> :: 5 {{energy}} 18 {{recharge}}<br /> :: [[Shout]]. For {{gr|2|7}} seconds, you and all party members [[within earshot]] gain {{gr|1|8}} [[armour]] and a further {{gr|12|50}} [[armour]] against incoming projectile attacks.<br /> : The flat armour bonus would make it a bit more powerful but not too much since it's not a big bonus (and it won't stack with people who already have +25 or more). The fact that the armour bonuses now scale with Tactics as well as the duration means that more Tactics makes it sorta exponentially more powerful - thus, it's better on a warrior with a rune than a paragon without (especially since a paragon will need quite high Leadership for their energy as well as Spear Mastery, whereas a Warrior could probably get away with sacrificing a point of Strength or two). What's more, the shorter duration means that it's less passive and more vulnerable to, say, diversion.<br /> <br /> == Impaled's Issue -- 16:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC) ==<br /> ;Issue<br /> :Huge, expensive armor bonus but only against ranged attacks.<br /> ;Suggestion<br /> :Shout. ({{gr|0|6}} seconds.) Party members in earshot have 100% chance to block while activating skills and +{{gr|0|25}} armor. Ends after blocking.<br /> :{{skill data|5|0|15}}<br /> :Now it would give either decent damage mitigation or 1 guaranteed block if you use a skill.</div>

gww>Wikichu