<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://gw1wiki.ezgame.cc/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Guild_Wars_Wiki%3AArbitration_committee%2F2007-12-16-User%3AArmond</id>
	<title>Guild Wars Wiki:Arbitration committee/2007-12-16-User:Armond - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://gw1wiki.ezgame.cc/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Guild_Wars_Wiki%3AArbitration_committee%2F2007-12-16-User%3AArmond"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gw1wiki.ezgame.cc/index.php?title=Guild_Wars_Wiki:Arbitration_committee/2007-12-16-User:Armond&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-18T19:55:57Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.17</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://gw1wiki.ezgame.cc/index.php?title=Guild_Wars_Wiki:Arbitration_committee/2007-12-16-User:Armond&amp;diff=8153&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>gww&gt;Dirigible at 05:21, 8 January 2008</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://gw1wiki.ezgame.cc/index.php?title=Guild_Wars_Wiki:Arbitration_committee/2007-12-16-User:Armond&amp;diff=8153&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2008-01-08T05:21:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;This page was created due to [http://wiki.guildwars.com/index.php?title=Guild_Wars_Wiki%3AArbitration_committee%2FRequests&amp;amp;diff=563986&amp;amp;oldid=533951 this] request for arbitration by [[User:74.62.153.41]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Issue at hand==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Armond stands accused of trolling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Decision about accepting the case for arbitration==&lt;br /&gt;
The case for or against acceptance is on [[Guild Wars Wiki talk:Arbitration committee/2007-12-16-User:Armond|the discussion page]], and open for input.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Decline''' - Erasculio and Armond had a small personal feud going on, but other users intervened before it got out of hand and both stopped. No need for arbcom. --[[User:Xeeron|Xeeron]] 15:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Decline''' - As Xeeron and Rezyk have pointed out, this request for arbitration seems premature, since the incident in question was fairly isolated and short lived. Even if it had been more severe, there are other options that need to be attempted before bringing a case to the ArbComm, such as contacting the users in question directly, and requesting attention  and and assistance from the the rest of the community at [[GWW:RFC]] or [[GWW:NOTICE]]. --[[User:Dirigible|Dirigible]] 00:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''Decline''' - I don't feel as strongly as my two colleagues about the decline vote. I think that Erasculio and Armond allowed their arguments to become disruptive to the wiki at large. While I agree that the arbitration request is premature I hope that both users in question will reflect on why someone thought arbitration was necessary. [[User:LordBiro|LordBiro]] 21:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--==Comments==&lt;br /&gt;
The case has been accepted and is now open to comments from everyone. This stage will last three days, and ends with the 1st of October. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ArbComm statement==&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Arbitration cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Declined arbitration cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>gww&gt;Dirigible</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>