gww>Tanetris: /* Decision */

2010-02-10T20:12:06Z

Decision

New page

== Issue at hand ==
''(Deletion log); 21:40 . . Misery (Talk | contribs) deleted "[[Guild Wars Wiki:Elections/2010-02 bureaucrat election/Droks]]" (G1: Purely vandalism)''
:This is uncalled for. My nomination should get as much respect as any other obvious candidate like Brains12 or Auron. Passing off my nomination as vandalism is just petty suppression and an abuse of admin rights. <small> —''The preceding [[Guild Wars Wiki:Sign your comments|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User:Kurz Hates Challenge|Kurz Hates Challenge]] ([[User talk:Kurz Hates Challenge|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kurz Hates Challenge|contribs]]) at 21:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC).</small>

== Decision ==

* '''Decline.''' The user being nominated has not made any contributions for over 1.5 years, I do not see a significant issue with the removal of the nomination if the sysop consensus is that it doesn't make sense. If the nomination is not a joke, I would recommend providing support for the motivation behind such an action as part of the nomination. <small>[[Image:User Aiiane-a.gif|Go to Aiiane's Talk page]] ([[User:Aiiane|Aiiane]] - [[User talk:Aiiane|''talk'']] - [[Special:Contributions/Aiiane|''contribs'']])</small> 21:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
* '''Decline.''' Not even close to an ArbComm issue. There are far better ways to protest a page deletion than running to ArbComm, and in this particular case I don't see much ground for a protest. - [[User:Tanetris|Tanetris]] 20:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

[[Category:Arbitration cases]]
[[Category:Declined arbitration cases]]

Guild Wars Wiki:Arbitration committee/2010-02-08-User:Misery - Revision history

gww>Tanetris: /* Decision */