gww>Ab.er.rant: replaced incorrectly named sig icon

2008-08-29T09:33:12Z

replaced incorrectly named sig icon

New page

{{notice|This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions.}}

===[[Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/AT|AT]]===
This request is for the sysophood of [[User:AT]] ([[User talk:AT|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AT|contribs]]). 
Created by —[[User:Tanaric|Tanaric]] 19:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC).

====Status====
Failed 17:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC) (candidate withdrew on the talk page).

====Candidate statement====
To echo others, I'm not quite sure what to put here. I'd hope that my attitude and actions are perceived as more important than this statement, but I'm also aware that I may not have the best grasp of current policy and technical code. However, I feel that I could make good use of sysop tools, and that another pair of hands to deal with housekeeping can't be bad. -- [[User:AT|'''AT''']]([[User talk:AT|''talk'']] | [[Special:Contributions/AT|''contribs'']]) 01:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

====Support====

# '''Support.''' Honest contributor, works hard, asset to the wiki, etc. :) —[[User:Tanaric|Tanaric]] 19:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
# '''Support.''' Will grasp and utilize sysop tools to benefit the wiki... and that is, in reality, the only thing that matters in the RfA process. -[[User:Auron|Auron]] 04:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

====Oppose====

# '''Oppose.''' Nothing personal, I just haven't seen AT on the wiki long enough yet to feel confident about him being a sysop. Might be a better idea to wait a few months and try again. --[[User:Xeeron|Xeeron]] 22:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
# '''Oppose.''' Same as Xeeron. It's better not to have too many sysops who we don't know too well, it's better to nominate only a few that we know really well. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] ([[User:Gem|gem]] / [[User talk:Gem|talk]]) 21:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
#Never seen him anywhere before.--'''[[User talk:Eloc Jcg|§]] [[User:Eloc Jcg|Eloc]] [[Special:Contributions/Eloc Jcg|§]]''' 01:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC) '''''Added''''':Not even 500 edits. I triple/quadruple his edits easily.--'''[[User talk:Eloc Jcg|§]] [[User:Eloc Jcg|Eloc]] [[Special:Contributions/Eloc Jcg|§]]''' 01:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' ...Who? [[Image:User Blastedt sig.jpg]][[User:Blastedt|BLASTEDT]] 15:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

====Neutral====

# '''Neutral.''' From what I've seen, AT is helpful around the wiki. But what I've seen is not very much at the moment. A little too early to tell for me. -- [[User:Ab.er.rant|ab.er]].[[User talk:Ab.er.rant|rant]] [[Image:User Ab.er.rant Sig.png|sig]] 16:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
# '''Neutral.''' I feel the same as Aberrant, It's a bit too early to tell. -- [[User:Scourge|Scourge]] [[Image:User Scourge Spade.gif]] 02:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
# '''Neutral.''' Ab.er.rant summed it up pretty well. [[Image:User Aiiane-a.gif|Go to Aiiane's Talk page]] ([[User:Aiiane|Aiiane]] - [[User talk:Aiiane|''talk'']] - [[Special:Contributions/Aiiane|''contribs'']]) 20:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
# '''Neutral.''' I have to echo this, I don't really know AT enough to vote for or against. --[[User:Lemming64|Lemming64 ]] 12:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

<noinclude>
{{DEFAULTSORT:AT}}
[[Category:Resolved RFAs]]
[[Category:Failed RFAs]]
</noinclude>

Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/AT - Revision history

gww>Ab.er.rant: replaced incorrectly named sig icon