gww>Pling: Undo revision 865679 by Wandering Traveler (Talk) withdrawn..

2008-05-10T15:57:39Z

Undo revision 865679 by Wandering Traveler (Talk) withdrawn..

New page

{{notice|This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions.}}

===[[Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Raph|Raph]]===
This request is for the sysophood of [[User:Raph]] ([[User talk:Raph|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raph|contribs]]). 
Created by [[Image:User_Raph_Sig.png|19px]][[User:Raph|'''Raph''']] [[User talk:Raph|'''Talky''']] 14:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC).

===Status===
Failed. 15:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

====Candidate statement====
<s>I wish to become a sysop here on the wiki because i feel i can do more good that way. I do not think burecrat would be a good position for me, but i think being a sysop, i could really help out the wiki. As well as being able to deal with any pesky vandals, gibber bots, etc. I also think i can handle the other responsibilities, such as keeping the peace in some situations, and cleaning up articles, and expanding stubs. In conclusion, i do not belive i would make a good burecrat, but i feel i could do a lot of good as a sysop--[[Image:User_Raph_Sig.png|19px]][[User:Raph|'''Raph''']] [[User talk:Raph|'''Talky''']] 14:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)</s>

ahem...i have withdrawn my RFA for the following reasons:{{clear}}

#I agree with all of the below statements, and that gives me insight as to what i really need and dont need
#I felt it a little self centered and somewhat pompous to mention Bcrat, I feel i just wish to have the power of a sysop...just because...

in conclusion, i feel i should wait for a while until i know whether or not i would make a good sysop
--[[Image:User_Raph_Sig.png|19px]][[User:Raph|'''Raph''']] [[User talk:Raph|'''Talky''']] 15:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

====Support====

# ...

====Oppose====

# '''Oppose.''' I can't shake the feeling that this entire nomination has a "Why not" feel to it and I can think of no reason that this user needs Sysop tools in order to contribute in a meaningful way. There's also nothing of which I'm aware that particularly distinguishes this user, certainly not so much so that he should be made a Sysop. [[Image:User Defiant Elements Sig Image.JPG|19x19px]] [[user:Defiant Elements|'''*Defiant Elements*''']] [[user talk:Defiant Elements|''+talk'']] 15:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
#'''Oppose.''' I'm getting the same vibes as DE. Raph has potential to be a great contributor, but I feel he can do the same work and same quality work as a normal user. [[User:Calor|Calor]] [[Image:User_Calor_Sig.png|19px|Talk]] 15:31, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
# '''Oppose.''' "''i feel i can do more good that way.''" -- unfortunately, I haven't seen Raph maxing out his ability to do "good" in order to require sysoption to increase that goodness; I cannot see how sysop tools will help him in his daily wiki life. I also don't understand why being a bureaucrat was brought up here - it's not a case of either being a bureaucrat or a sysop to be on the wiki. I haven't seen Raph mediating conflicts or trying to reduce the drama as he explains on the talk page, so I doubt being a sysop would enact that now -- and anyway, being a sysop isn't needed to do that. I'm reminded a little of [[Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Hawk Skeer]]. --[[Image:User Brains12 Spiral.png|15px|Pling! \]] [[User:Brains12|Brains12]] 15:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
# '''Oppose.''' For the reasons stated above. -- [[Image:User indochine lambda.png|14px]][[User:Indochine|'''Indochine''']] [[User talk:Indochine|''talk'']] 15:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
# '''Oppose.''' What brains and DE said, basically. (This probably sounds weird coming from me, being as equally unknown as Raph, lol) '''--''' [[User:Mini Me|'''Mini Me''']] [[Image:User Mini Me sig.png|19px|talk]] 15:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

====Neutral====

# ...

<noinclude>
[[Category:Resolved RFAs|Raph]]
[[Category:Failed RFAs|Raph]]</noinclude>

Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Raph - Revision history

gww>Pling: Undo revision 865679 by Wandering Traveler (Talk) withdrawn..