Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship/Armond

From Guild Wars Wiki 中文站
< Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for adminship
Revision as of 22:26, 4 October 2009 by gww>Pling
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
File:Info-Logo.png Note: This RFA has been resolved. Please do not add further support/oppose opinions.

Armond

This request is for the sysophood of Armond (talk • contribs • logs • block log).
Created by -- Armond WarbladeFile:User Armond sig image.png{{Bacon}} 02:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC).

Status

Failed. 22:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Candidate statement

Hi, oppose me.

But before you do, yes, this is actually serious. My main intent here is to set a baseline for people's expectations. I recognize that I'm not fit for adminship on this wiki (for the same reasons Vili was opposed so much, basically), but I find that simply telling myself "ok, as of this date, you're going to stop trolling/being a douche/etc and actually try to help out on wiki" doesn't seem to work for whatever reason. As such, I'm putting myself in the community spotlight. I figure after this dies I'll try again in a few months and see how much people think I've improved, what else I need to work on, etc. It might take a few more goes, but meh, wiki-sysop skills can be useful real life skills to, so it's worth working on.

Don't support with "he did a great job on PvX". It's been a while, and PvX's environment was almost completely different from GWW's (unlike GWiki's, before someone points out that this is what I did with Vili). Also, I kind of didn't do a great job there.

Here's to a better me.

-- Armond WarbladeFile:User Armond sig image.png{{Bacon}} 02:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Support

  1. to be different (and get lulz)--Unendingfear File:User Unendingfear Crane.jpg 04:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. "<Armond> Who wants me to create good drama?" ~Shard File:User Shard Sig Icon.png 03:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  2. are you fucking joking? no. --adrin File:User Adrin mysig.jpg 03:42, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  3. can you guys stop putting stupid rfas forward and acting like you're gonna reform? -Auron 05:45, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  4. Like you said in your statement. First stop being all that. Titani Uth Ertan 05:50, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  5. Armond, I don't see enough positive that you'd be good and helpful with the community. You can have a few good arguments, but not even with you wanting to be into 'drama'(As stated in mIrc of which shard posted.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ariyen (talk • contribs) at 05:59, 28 September 2009 (UTC).
  6. "<Armond> yes, this is actually serious"(ly a joke). -- My Talk Lacky 06:21, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  7. As per the candidate statement C4K3 File:User C4K3 Signature.jpg Talk 06:23, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  8. Stop dropping my name like it means something. Other than that, you shouldn't tip your hand so easily if you're truly serious about getting ops (which, since it's you, I don't doubt). Vili 点 User talk:Vili 07:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  9. So all of a sudden, this page is just a means of putting yourself in the community spotlight? Essays belong in userspace, bye. — WhyUser talk:Why Are We Fighting 10:32, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  10. No comment. — Jon File:User Jon Lupen Sig Image.png Lupen 13:30, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  11. lol - Mini Me talk 14:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  12. tbh, I would have supported you, but I supported Vili as well....so what does that say of me? Karate File:User Karate Jesus KJ for sig.png Jesus 14:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  13. Oppose Uhh... - J.P.FeedbackTalk 14:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  14. Oppose. Change first before you go for an RfA.. Nobody will believe you that you want to change (what probably won't happen anyway) after a successful RfA.. poke | talk 14:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  15. Oppose. Change that there's no possibility I will believe in. -- FreedomBoundFile:User Freedom Bound Sig.png 15:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  16. Oppose Not neutral enough — Seru File:User Seru Sig2.png Talk 15:24, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  17. ^Poke. – Emmett 00:15, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
  18. cool story, bro. --Cursed Angel Q.Q 07:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
  19. Oppose -- Halogod35 File:User Halogod35 Sig.jpg
  20. Oppose — Defiant Elements +talk 15:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
  21. Oppose Move to userspace please ~ KurdFile:User Kurd sig.png 21:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
  22. Oppose. Sorry man, not this time. --File:User Wandering Traveler Sig2.png Wandering Traveler 21:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
  23. Oppose. Can i haz rfa tew?-- File:User Vanguard VanguardLogo.pnganguard 18:13, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
  24. Oppose lolwut? Cress Arvein File:User Cress Arvein sig.JPG 00:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
  25. What poke said. King Neoterikos 00:54, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Too arrogant for sentry of teh wikilands. I wont oppose cuz he hasn't done anything wrong to me yet. :> Nectarines // 15:02 28 September 2009(UTC)
  2. I seem to have started an amusing trend, let's see how far this goes. Personally, I think everybody should be sysop after they get autoconfirmed. That's just me though. —Jette File:User Jette awesome.png 15:06, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  3. I accept Armond's challenge to set a baseline for new behavior from the date of this RFA forward. I hope that Armond continues to have strong opinions and yet change the way in which they are expressed (e.g. showing consideration that others might not share those well-founded opinions). I think a helpful Armond would be a powerful force for this wiki.   — Tennessee Ernie Ford (TEF) 08:47, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
  4. --Dominator Matrix 05:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://gw1wiki.ezgame.cc/index.php?title=Guild_Wars_Wiki:Requests_for_adminship/Armond&oldid=9029"